An official website of the United States government.
<p>Given that more recent figures are available, the FSA commissioned an extension to the IID2 study to incorporate the contemporary data from the IID2 study with other sources (outbreaks and results from a systematic literature review) using a new approach to update UK-wide estimates for foodborne disease. (Currently this is only available for England and Wales.)</p>
<p>The IID2 study extension aimed to estimate the burden of UK-acquired foodborne disease in 2009, when the IID2 study was carried out, and to quantify the contribution of different pathogens and various food commodities to total foodborne disease burden.</p>
<p>To meet the first objective, a model was developed to estimate the number of cases, general practice (GP) consultations and hospital admissions of indigenous foodborne disease, due to the major enteric pathogens. Several different data sources were used to obtain information on model parameters and their associated uncertainty. Data on pathogen-specific rates of disease were obtained from the IID1 and IID2 studies. Data were also used from reported outbreaks in the UK and the published literature, obtained from a systematic review that was conducted to inform estimates of the proportion of IID cases attributable to foodborne transmission. The IID1 and IID2 studies and outbreak data also provided information on pathogen-specific hospitalisation rates.</p>
<p>Information on these parameters was incorporated into models to estimate pathogen-specific numbers of cases, GP consultations and hospital admissions in 2009. Two modelling approaches were used: a Monte Carlo simulation, which is the standard method as used by several research groups worldwide, and a Bayesian approach, which is novel in this field. Three modelling simulations were generated - one using Monte Carlo and two using Bayesian methods.</p>
<p>To meet the second objective, the food attribution model was extended to estimate: the number of cases, GP consultations and hospital admissions attributable to different food commodities. Information on the proportion of cases attributable to different pathogens and food commodities was obtained from an analysis of UK outbreak surveillance data and published food attribution studies. Twelve food commodity groups were used. These were seafood, dairy, eggs, red meat, game, beef and lamb, pork, poultry, grains and beans, oils and sugars, produce, complex and other foods.</p>
<p>Background: Many cases of food poisoning go undetected or unreported. For a number of years the FSA has drawn on the infectious intestinal disease (IID) study and related work by Public Health England to estimate and monitor the burden of foodborne disease, based on the number of laboratory confirmed cases.</p>
<p>The original IID study (IID1) was carried out in the mid 1990s, and was the first of its kind to estimate the total number of cases of infectious intestinal disease (diarrhoea and vomiting) in England (both food and non-food related). More recently, a second infectious intestinal disease study (IID2) updated this work, and looked at the UK as a whole. The IID2 study, which was published in 2011, was designed to estimate the overall rate of IID in the UK in 2009, to assess whether the overall level of IID had changed since the original study, as well as determining estimated rates for individual pathogens.</p>